Evidence sheetREAL-015
Level BPartial with imageryCorn testimonial in China
- Crop
- Corn / Maize
- Country
- China
- Problem
- Low production
- Result
- +10.3%
- Peso fresco
- 20.6%
- Confidence
- 62/100
Original technical document
Testimonial Maíz en China.docx · Chinese corn results.doc
This report is based on documented field evidence. Some technical details not available in the original report were conservatively estimated by the technical team for guidance purposes and remain subject to confirmation.
Product applied
Nano-Gro
The original report did not record the exact dose. Check the recommended dose in the product technical sheet.
Any dose must be confirmed with the technical team before application: it depends on the crop, the stage, and your field conditions.
Summary
Chinese maize testimonial with fresh, dry and total weight comparison table.
Crop & Location
Corn / Maize / China
Initial Challenge
Low production
Nano-Gro Application
Nano-Gro treatment documented in testimonial.
Observed Results
Table reports increases including 10.41%, 20.60%, 15.25% and 10.30% across measured weight indicators.
Evidence Available
2 technical document received, 3 field photographic record
Before, during, and after
Before / after comparison



Field photographic record
Fotografía incluida en el informe original de campo.

Field photographic record
Fotografía incluida en el informe original de campo.

Field photographic record
Fotografía incluida en el informe original de campo.
Documents
Download Original ReportRead the original report
The full field report, without leaving this page. No download needed.
Read the reportTestimonial Maíz en China.docx
Transcription of the original document. Tables may have lost their formatting. The intact file is downloadable below.
Testimonial Company Name: Huifeng Seed Company Plant Date: 2011 4 28 Plants Type: Corn Treatment Method: Treated with NG VS. Untreated Record Period: Every 3 days Record With Photo The Final Result Includes: Treatment Method Dissolved 1 pellet of NG per 1L of water,then poured water into a catch basin for 20 seconds in order to fully soak the seeds. The seeds were dried away from direct sunlight. Output Total Category Numbers Lines Grain Weight of 1000 (g) Fresh Weight (kg) Dry Weight (kg) Total Weight (kg) Treated Ludan 981 Untreated Ludan 981 increase 2.13% -3.92% 10.41% 20.60% 15.25% 10.30% Comparison with root and appearance Comparison in the field Summary Note: The corn that was treated all improved their height, radicel’s number, caudex’s diameter. The leaf colour is deeper and stronger than untreated. Those can prove they have more power for bad environment. The corn cob grows better and sooner, the grain has more weight. Colour is more bright. Quality is better than untreated. After this test we know NG is a great product which can help corn grow better. It can be recommended to be used in all corn fields. I can say NG is the best product for treating corn seed based upon what I have seen.




